#Best panorama stitcher android
Requires Android 4.0 or higher – which should be easy to match. Not too many dependencies: a single app with ~6 MB.When done, the panorama is stored on the internal SD card in the Pictures/Panoramas/ folder, and shown on the app's initial page. A progress bar in the notification area lets you see how far it already got. Easy to use: Select the photos from the gallery, tap OK, done.Not an exact match, but a substitute that does the job for photos I've created with my Android smartphone anyway:īimostitch Panorama Stitcher matches all my requirements (except for the OS). Note: When I say "panorama" I don't mean 360° but rather 2-5 images to be joined ("wide shot").
![best panorama stitcher best panorama stitcher](https://i0.wp.com/digital-photography-school.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/AK-Haines-landscape-evening-012117-47.jpg)
#Best panorama stitcher free
Should be free (as in "free speach" and "free beer"). Being in the standard repositories (or even a PPA) would be a big plus. I'm currently using Linux Mint Cinnamon, so please no KDE apps (I don't want to draw in half of the KDE desktop just for this task). Took a look at fotoxx – but that wanted to first index all my images, which I do not want (what for, if I only want to create one panorama? I don't want the stitcher to manage my entire collection).
![best panorama stitcher best panorama stitcher](https://bitsdujourblob.blob.core.windows.net/software/screenshot/arcsoft-panorama-maker-6-stitch-photo-kvbwb.png)
The one built-in to Gimp (formerly distributed separately as " Pandora") can only be used for real simple things, and otherwise fails e.g. Photos taken with a smartphone often lack the lens information Hugin wants to know before loading, and I've got no idea where to get those details from (guess that's the main issue here for me, which then cuases the "bad results"). I've tried Hugin, but it failed me: often didn't even match the images – and even if I added a bunch of control points manually, generating a useful result image was a mess and much too complicated. > Pentax D-FA50 f/1.4: comment from PF : "Most 50mm lenses don't have significant issues with geometric distortion, and the HD Pentax-D FA* 50mm F1.I'm looking for an easy to use panorama stitcher for Linux that doesn't have too many dependencies. comment from PF 50mm lens comparison: "We are happy to report that none of the Pentax 50mm lenses had any measurable distortion." comment from PF review "This lens is designed as a macro lens with a flat field of focus and no distortion and we were definitely not able to detect any distortion." > Pentax D-FA70-200 f/2.8: 0.9% at 70mm, -0.6% 135mm, -0.5% 200mm problem with the DFA70-200 is the nodal point moves a lot from near front of the lens at 200mm to back of the camera at 70mm, very sensitive to the focal length and a pain to adjust in the field. ephotozine test: "70mm gives +1.45% pincushion distortion"
#Best panorama stitcher full
With the idea of reproducing a 4x5 exposure area by stitching multiple exposures from a Pentax K1, the "crop" factor between 4x5 and full frame being about 3x, for a wide angle shot I'd need to use a focal length of 100mm (more or less depending on the final FoV of the stitched composition). Going into Pentax forum in depth lens review or ephotozine test results, we can compare lenses on how much optical distorsion they produce. Along with parallax errors, non-ideal lens distorsion is a pain for stitching images since not all distorsion follow a nice a,b,c distorsion correction model, resulting in some mismatch between frames.